Difference between revisions of "Optimising geometry"
Mikehgentry (talk | contribs) m |
Mikehgentry (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page needs vetting by someone who understands rendering. Believe it at your peril. | This page needs vetting by someone who understands rendering. Believe it at your peril. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* All faces are triangles as far as the engine is concerned. A more complex face is reduced to triangles. | * All faces are triangles as far as the engine is concerned. A more complex face is reduced to triangles. | ||
| − | * Vertices and edges don't matter as such. If you create three vertices, create edges between them, divide those edges into parts then create a | + | * Vertices and edges don't matter as such. If you create three vertices, create edges between them, divide those edges into parts then create a face between the original three vertices you still have a triangle. In Blender, when you select a face the delineating vertices will be highlighted - if there are three of them, it's a triangle :-) |
| − | * Removing double vertices helps to get rid of extra faces - under Mesh Tools in Blender | + | * Removing double vertices often helps to get rid of extra faces - under Mesh Tools in Blender |
| + | * Backfaces and internal faces are bad, because they waste renderer cycles and risk creating glitches where a face shows over a face it should be behind. If you're building your model using geometric primitives, be sure to remove all the internal faces where possible. In Blender 'local view' or use of layers help immensely. Set your objects to single sided unless you have specific need to use faces with two sides. | ||
| + | * That said, there is a balance between removing internal faces and overcomplicating the geometry. Too many triangles strains the renderer. If you've got a small mesh intersecting a face, cutting the face up to meet the mesh introduces extra triangles, and is a judgement call. | ||
Revision as of 17:29, 28 January 2013
This page needs vetting by someone who understands rendering. Believe it at your peril.
- All faces are triangles as far as the engine is concerned. A more complex face is reduced to triangles.
- Vertices and edges don't matter as such. If you create three vertices, create edges between them, divide those edges into parts then create a face between the original three vertices you still have a triangle. In Blender, when you select a face the delineating vertices will be highlighted - if there are three of them, it's a triangle :-)
- Removing double vertices often helps to get rid of extra faces - under Mesh Tools in Blender
- Backfaces and internal faces are bad, because they waste renderer cycles and risk creating glitches where a face shows over a face it should be behind. If you're building your model using geometric primitives, be sure to remove all the internal faces where possible. In Blender 'local view' or use of layers help immensely. Set your objects to single sided unless you have specific need to use faces with two sides.
- That said, there is a balance between removing internal faces and overcomplicating the geometry. Too many triangles strains the renderer. If you've got a small mesh intersecting a face, cutting the face up to meet the mesh introduces extra triangles, and is a judgement call.
